Since context is helpful to deepen a discussion, I’d like to share a few “dots” (impactful content or life experiences that shape one’s philosophy) behind this post:

1. The book Sacred Economics by Charles Eisenstein (post here has been most influential in my broad economic/financial philosophy. For example, one may disagree on whether the key issue is lack of circulation and a buildup of inequality, as I argue here and is discussed in Sacred Economics, or wasteful/socially sub-optimal spending, such as argued here, in which the author proposes no estate tax and a progressive consumption tax.

2. Inequality: What Can Be Done by Tony Atkinson is another dot in my understanding about the need to address equity/extreme inequality, and the estate tax as a means to do so.

3. To those who may agree with the issue but recoil at the idea of increasing government’s role in society - I hope you will spend some of your career in the public sector. And I wish more civil servants would get some experience in the private sector. A major dot is my brief working life is the comparison between these two experiences. In the private sector, I admire some beautifully run organizations with minimal bureaucracy or politics (the first I worked at, Epic, is a prime example of this), but in the public sector, I marvel at the actual work the people do. We could never rely on private companies to so relentlessly pursue things like safety or access/equity, whether we’re talking about mobility and infrastructure, natural resources, etc. Perhaps more realistically, The Fifth Risk is an excellent book on this subject.

Written by

One cannot fix one's eyes on the commonest natural production without finding food for a rambling fancy.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store